Skip to content
Environmental consultancy service

Phase 2 Ground Investigation

A Phase 2 Ground Investigation (intrusive site investigation) uses trial pits, boreholes, sampling, laboratory testing and monitoring where required to verify and quantify contamination and ground risks identified at desktop stage or through planning review.

Scope and evidence

Built around planning, development and compliance decisions.

Use this page to understand when the service is usually needed, what evidence is reviewed and what information helps us quote accurately.

  • Planning and regulator context
  • Clear deliverables and next steps
  • Linked services considered early

A Phase 2 Ground Investigation — also commonly described as a Phase II or intrusive site investigation — should convert the uncertainties identified at desktop stage into measured site evidence. The investigation strategy should be tied to the Conceptual Site Model, proposed development and planning or design decisions rather than treated as a generic drilling exercise.

01

When this service is used

Used to discharge contaminated-land planning conditions, investigate risks identified by a Phase 1 Desk Study or preliminary risk assessment, support land acquisition and due diligence, and provide measured ground data for remediation or development design.

Planning and project supportUsed for contaminated-land condition discharge, brownfield redevelopment, land acquisition and projects where intrusive evidence is needed before remediation, design or construction decisions.
Risk and programme controlA targeted Phase 2 reduces uncertainty by testing credible pollutant linkages and ground risks identified by the Phase 1, planning review or previous site information.
02

What the report normally includes

  • Review of the Phase 1, planning condition and Conceptual Site Model
  • Site-specific intrusive investigation and sampling plan
  • Trial pits, boreholes or other intrusive techniques as scoped
  • Soil, groundwater and ground gas sampling or monitoring where required
  • Accredited laboratory chemical testing and geotechnical testing where appropriate
  • Interpretation of results and quantitative risk assessment where required
  • Updated Conceptual Site Model with recommendations for remediation, further investigation, monitoring or design
03

What we need from you

Providing the right information at the start helps us confirm the scope, quote accurately and avoid back-and-forth once the work is underway.

  • Site address and red-line boundary plan
  • Phase 1 Desk Study and previous reports where available
  • Planning condition wording or regulator comments
  • Proposed development layout and current site use
  • Access constraints and buried-services information
  • Investigation deadline and any monitoring or design requirements
04

Phase 2 Ground Investigation and intrusive site investigation: what it should prove

Ground investigation drilling and sample logging on a development site.
Intrusive Phase 2 Ground Investigation using site-specific fieldwork, sampling and testing to replace assumptions with measured evidence.
What a robust scope should cover
  • Review of the Phase 1, planning condition and current Conceptual Site Model
  • A site-specific intrusive investigation strategy with justified locations and depths
  • Trial pits, window sampling, boreholes or other techniques selected for the site
  • Soil, groundwater, ground-gas or vapour sampling and monitoring where relevant
  • Accredited laboratory chemical testing and geotechnical testing where required
  • Interpretation of results through generic or detailed quantitative risk assessment where appropriate
  • Updated Conceptual Site Model with recommendations for remediation, further investigation, monitoring or design
What the work should leave you with
  • Measured evidence of actual ground and contamination conditions
  • A clearer understanding of whether suspected pollutant linkages are present and significant
  • Evidence that can support contaminated-land planning condition discharge
  • Data for remediation, earthworks, foundation, drainage or waste-management decisions
  • A defensible technical report showing what was investigated, what was found and what should happen next
Why the detail mattersEnvironment Agency LCRM guidance treats intrusive site investigation as a way to collect and analyse the detailed information needed to reduce uncertainty, test the Conceptual Site Model and support risk assessment. Trial pits, exploratory boreholes and monitoring wells should therefore be selected to answer defined site questions, not simply added by quantity.Environment Agency LCRM: intrusive site investigation →See an EnviroSolution ground-investigation project →
05

Useful to know before you enquire

Phase 1 usually defines the Phase 2 scopeA Phase 1 Desk Study, planning condition or other preliminary risk assessment should normally identify the potential pollutant linkages and uncertainties the intrusive work needs to test.
Buried services and safe access affect investigation designService records, working areas, access restrictions and site operations can change the drilling or trial-pit method and locations.
Groundwater and ground gas may need return visitsSome risks cannot be characterised from one mobilisation, so the programme may need monitoring installations and repeat rounds before conclusions can be reached.
Geo-environmental and geotechnical work can often be coordinatedWhere both contamination and engineering ground data are needed, the investigation can often be designed to gather compatible information during the same mobilisation.
FAQ

Common questions

Is a Phase 2 Ground Investigation the same as an intrusive site investigation?

Phase 2 is commonly used to describe the intrusive investigation stage that follows a desk-based preliminary assessment. Depending on the project it can include trial pits, boreholes, soil and groundwater sampling, gas monitoring, laboratory testing and risk assessment.

Do I need a Phase 1 before Phase 2?

Usually, yes. The Phase 1, planning condition or other preliminary risk assessment should identify the potential pollutant linkages and uncertainties so the intrusive investigation can be targeted rather than generic.

What investigation techniques might be used?

The method depends on access, geology, target depth and the risks being investigated. Typical techniques include trial pits, window sampling, cable percussion or rotary boreholes and in-situ testing.

Can Phase 2 help discharge a contaminated-land planning condition?

Yes, where the condition requires intrusive evidence. Whether it is sufficient for discharge depends on the condition wording, the findings and whether remediation, further investigation or verification is still required.

Guides

Phase 2 ground investigation and planning guidance

These supporting resources explain when intrusive investigation is triggered, how to scope it and how the results support planning decisions. Use this service page when you need a Phase 2 quote.

Projects

Phase 2 investigation examples

See how similar environmental constraints have been investigated, assessed and resolved on real projects.

Next

Related services

These services are often reviewed alongside Phase 2 Ground Investigation depending on the site, planning context and proposed development.

Structured enquiry

Send the right information first time.

Our custom enquiry builder asks service-specific questions so we can confirm the correct scope, identify linked services and avoid unnecessary delays.

Add to enquiryView all services
Ready to send details?

Build one enquiry for this and any related services.

Submit site information, planning references and supporting documents once. We’ll review the scope and confirm what is required.

Add this service to enquiry